- Joined
- Mar 20, 2005
- Location
- Morganton NC
Just to move it along, let's skip past the heater it's self, and go to upgrades. Now, I've been o You Tube University, and watched a bunch of videos on upgrades, mainly to the exhaust.
So, this is basically a furnace, burn pot and all. So with this type of heat, there has to be an exhaust. What I have seen is different ways to capture heat off the exhaust, so as not to loose all that heat that is expelled. They seem legit as far has shooting the temp into the exhaust heat capturing apparatus, and out of it. I've seen where one guy used an old water radiator that used to be a standard heat source from a remote water boiler. Another used one of those oil filled electric radiant heaters. Not shown, but was mentioned in one guys comments, he used a inter-cooler.
I like the old radiator idea, but sourcing one has been the issue. I don't like the electric idea simply because of what all is required to adapt it. My thoughts are leaning a lil different direction. I am thinking a cheap radiator off FB market place run the exhaust in at the top, and out the bottom. The top would have to be hard plumbed fitting to adapt it into the radiator, the bottom, from what I have seen, would be cool enough to simply use rubber hoses as with all the tests I have seen, temps are way below any temps that would melt or otherwise damage the hose. My thinking is to not use it so much as just using it as radiant heat, but more so to direct the heat. I'm thinking some type of lower speed fan, blowing through the fins(just like on a vehicle, just slower(power usage and with lower heat and not pressurized), Directing the heat out, instead of up into the ceiling of my 12 walled, 16' peak, un-insulated building. Doing this has me with one concern, it was mentioned once, just not addressed, is "back pressure" My thinking(And this might be stinkin' thinkin',Is air is thinner that water, so if liquids can run though all the cooling tubes i a radiator, exhaust should be able to also. From what I have seen mentioned by some is water condensate from the exhaust, from what gathered, it's not an issue, but if there was, it'd go to the bottom, and the petcock would be able to be utilized to get it out.
So.... that's my thoughts and ideas. Any thoughts and or ideas welcomed.
So, this is basically a furnace, burn pot and all. So with this type of heat, there has to be an exhaust. What I have seen is different ways to capture heat off the exhaust, so as not to loose all that heat that is expelled. They seem legit as far has shooting the temp into the exhaust heat capturing apparatus, and out of it. I've seen where one guy used an old water radiator that used to be a standard heat source from a remote water boiler. Another used one of those oil filled electric radiant heaters. Not shown, but was mentioned in one guys comments, he used a inter-cooler.
I like the old radiator idea, but sourcing one has been the issue. I don't like the electric idea simply because of what all is required to adapt it. My thoughts are leaning a lil different direction. I am thinking a cheap radiator off FB market place run the exhaust in at the top, and out the bottom. The top would have to be hard plumbed fitting to adapt it into the radiator, the bottom, from what I have seen, would be cool enough to simply use rubber hoses as with all the tests I have seen, temps are way below any temps that would melt or otherwise damage the hose. My thinking is to not use it so much as just using it as radiant heat, but more so to direct the heat. I'm thinking some type of lower speed fan, blowing through the fins(just like on a vehicle, just slower(power usage and with lower heat and not pressurized), Directing the heat out, instead of up into the ceiling of my 12 walled, 16' peak, un-insulated building. Doing this has me with one concern, it was mentioned once, just not addressed, is "back pressure" My thinking(And this might be stinkin' thinkin',Is air is thinner that water, so if liquids can run though all the cooling tubes i a radiator, exhaust should be able to also. From what I have seen mentioned by some is water condensate from the exhaust, from what gathered, it's not an issue, but if there was, it'd go to the bottom, and the petcock would be able to be utilized to get it out.
So.... that's my thoughts and ideas. Any thoughts and or ideas welcomed.