So, Ramsey corp doesn't want folks to be able to protect themselves. I CCW and I vote with my wallet.
http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=07-5166&s=OK&d=39224
http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=07-5166&s=OK&d=39224
But I think that's the point. They have the right to refuse to allow firearms, and we have the right to refuse to buy their products. Thats the beauty of freedom, it goes both ways, and it's a risk you take as a business by taking a stand for or against something.I ccw daily, and this really doesn't upset me. It's private property (as opposed to what I'd call semi-public, i.e. retail stores, offices open to the general public, etc), and governed by employee/employer contract. A company should be FREE to make it's own policies regarding it's employees. If an employee doesn't like the policy, it's a free market, and he can seek work elsewhere. You take a job, you sign the employment contract, you are agreeing to abide by whatever they put in it, or walk.
Now, if this was walmart booting a legally carrying, invited (by open premises) citizen/customer in a (semi) public area of the retail store, then yes, I would have a problem with it.
Quintiles has a similar policy. I met some pretty cool people over that, because some of them walked around the corner to my company's smoking area.So I'm curious about an analogous debate.
Not long ago, the WFU Medical Center went to a complete No Smoking Campus policy. No smoking ANYWHERE on the property except in "designated areas". Of which there are liek 2 for the whole ocmplex.
This includes parking lots and *inside your own car*. E.g. you can't go outside, sit in you car w/ the windows up, and smoke.
how do you feel about that?
(BTW, similar CCW rule too)