what the......

RatLabGuy said:
You have admit, that takes some balls.
Click to expand...


no..it takes ovaries.


also...i'd like to hear the explanation of "artificial insemination" and "as many times as possible".

sounds like she might be the campus whore.
 
BigRedB2 said:
no..it takes ovaries.
also...i'd like to hear the explanation of "artificial insemination" and "as many times as possible".
sounds like she might be the campus whore.
Click to expand...

well "artifical" directly means you aren't doing it the good old fashioned way. Syringe, turkey baster - you can bet it wasn't via a clinic, no student could afford taht repeatedly.

"as many times as possible" - repeat above as necessary, every 28 days.
 
yeah...but how was she collecting and storing it?! does she have a fridge full of man sauce!
 
BigRedB2 said:
no..it takes ovaries.
also...i'd like to hear the explanation of "artificial insemination" and "as many times as possible".
sounds like she might be the campus whore.
Click to expand...


if you read the entire article you would have seen that she came back out and claimed that it was all false...


"Her art project includes visual representations," Klasky wrote. "[Schvarts] stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages. The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman's body," she wrote. "Had these acts been real they would have violated basic ethical standards and raised serious mental and physical health concerns."
 
she's an attention whore...and look, she got a 4x4 forum based 700 miles away to talk about her. Hmm, I'll be in New Haven Saturday, maybe I'll swing by the campus art gallery....












not!
 
awheelterd said:
if you read the entire article you would have seen that she came back out and claimed that it was all false...
"Her art project includes visual representations," Klasky wrote. "[Schvarts] stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages. The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman's body," she wrote. "Had these acts been real they would have violated basic ethical standards and raised serious mental and physical health concerns."
Click to expand...

That part of the artiucle was changed, added after this thread got started. Original version at least how it read as of early this afternoon) said nothing about that. I even read a few other articles on it at the time.
This is the downside to online news, things get updated and changed contantly
 
lol..it doesnt change my opinion of her. i still think she is twisted.


But..it does clear up the worry i had of all that DNA being on display. that was kinda worrisome...in a CDC kinda way.
 
well, now she's back to claiming its real. she says the university is saying its fake but she stands behind her claim. what a looney tune.
 
Back
Top