anybody catch this article in the Charlotte paper over the weekend?

bigwaylon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Location
Charlotte
http://www.charlotte.com/mobile/story/288267.html


Posted on Sat, Sep. 22, 2007
Landowners feel railroaded
CHRISTOPHER D. KIRKPATRICK

Concord auto mechanic Frank Abernethy, struggling to run his small business, was caught off guard by the unannounced visit from the railroad agent.

It was early August when the employee from the state-owned N.C. Railroad Co. showed up at his garage and demanded he sign a lease for $1,200 a year in rent and fees. He also said Abernethy needed $1 million in insurance because his shop sits too close to the tracks.

Even though the mechanic bought the property in 2005, the railroad says it technically owns his land -- and has 19th-century deeds as proof.

"Nobody told me that when I bought the building," Abernethy said this week. "I told the guy, `What are you trying to do, put me out of business?' "

The railroad says there are hundreds of other property owners like Abernethy along its 317-mile line from Charlotte to Morehead City. One day, the company could try to reclaim the disputed parcels. But for now, the railroad just wants rent, said Scott Saylor, railroad president.

It's part of the railroad's push to take back and manage its right of way -- the 200-foot-wide buffer along the tracks.

For years, the railroad didn't know how many businesses were on its property or encroaching on the right of way. But now, the railroad has the mapping technology to identify -- and go after -- those businesses.

Some Concord business owners say they're being harassed by railroad agents who want them to sign lease agreements for using the right of way or for having buildings on disputed land.

N.C. Rep. Jeff Barnhart, a Cabarrus County Republican, is upset about the railroad's treatment of the small-business owners in his district. "It sure does appear to many that the big guys are just trying to take advantage of the little guys," he wrote in a letter last week to the railroad.

Saylor said the disputes stem from surveying errors and lax oversight -- more than 150 years in the making.

"The railroad's charter dates back to an era when there was no development," he said. "Sometimes surveyors would look at the wrong railroad charter and think the right of way was only 100 feet wide."

The railroad currently collects on 233 lease agreements with small businesses along the length of the line, said Kat Christian, a railroad spokeswoman. At least 120 newly identified businesses, including Abernethy's, haven't signed or responded to letters, she said.

New lease agreements would mean extra revenue for the railroad, which is trying to handle an increase in freight traffic and future commuter train projects, such as providing space for portions of Charlotte's transit system, Saylor said.

"Our goal is to make sure the corridor is available for all future uses," he said. "Obviously, Charlotte is a major transportation hub."

Concord is among several trouble spots for the railroad because the tracks run parallel to what were once major highway routes. Unchecked development flourished along those routes, creeping into the railroad's right of way, Saylor said.

The company has no plans to target homeowners, he said. But state law allows railroads to displace anyone -- including homeowners -- living in the right of way, said David Lawrence, a professor of public law and government with the UNC School of Government.

And that worries Abernethy and others who own property near the tracks.

The 54-year-old mechanic said he received a bill from the railroad earlier this month. He returned it along with a hand-written warning: "You will not come into my place of business and upset me or my family again."

Railroad history

The N.C. Railroad Co. operates as a private company, even though the state owns all the stock. It has owned the rail line since 1849 -- a critical period of economic development for North Carolina. The railroad remains a vital artery today, carrying freight and passengers through the state's major population and commercial centers.Even though the state owns the railroad, the line was used and maintained by Norfolk Southern under a 99-year lease that ended in 1995. After four years of court battles, they reached a new accord. Norfolk agreed to track rights for 45 years, while the state kept control of the 200-foot right of way. The General Assembly in 2000 passed a law allowing the state-owned railroad to pursue the right-of-way lease agreements, Saylor said.

Norfolk turned over its records, including existing lease agreements. Saylor said it has taken the past seven years to receive and organize the records, research deeds and old maps and digitally chart the railroad and its right of way.

For the past three years, the railroad has been pursuing new lease agreements with businesses in the right of way. As the digital mapping project nears completion this year, more and more of the parcels and business owners are being identified.

That's where the calls and surprise visits come in.

The railroad has two employees pursuing the lease agreements. They've been working the phones and dropping by businesses unannounced to ask the sometimes-startled owners to sign the agreements, which include 3 percent annual increases. The fees vary from parcel to parcel, but have averaged more than $2,000 each, said Christian, the railroad spokeswoman.

The railroad said it could take Abernethy and the other defiant business owners to court to collect the rent, but hasn't decided whether it will take that step, Saylor said. "We're trying to work with everyone on the line."

`I own the land'

On Thursday, freight trains stopped traffic as they rumbled through the community of small- business owners. The tracks run between Kannapolis Highway and South Ridge Avenue at the edge of the Concord city limits.

Businessman Joe Plott, just down the road from Abernethy, owns six parcels with used car lots and other businesses near the tracks. He was contacted by the railroad, which wants him to pay $6,000 a year plus $1,200 in administrative fees, he said.

He said the railroad's motivation is purely financial: "If they collect $1,200 from every business, they'd never have to run a single train again."

On the other side of the tracks, Rodger Chambers runs European Import Classics on South Ridge. Unlike Abernethy, his building stops at the edge of the right of way, where a black iron stake marks the boundary.

But Chambers parks some cars in the right of way, which is buffered from the tracks by tall overgrown bushes. Last month, a railroad agent stopped by to collect rent, saying the company had noticed his cars from a fly-over in an airplane. He refused to sign a lease and told her to leave.

Two weeks later, she called to ask if he had moved the cars and threatened to put up a barricade to block off the area behind his building, he said. "I told her I didn't have any intention of moving them. I own the land."

Abernethy, who owns Universal Automotive Service on Kannapolis Highway, said he's thinking about hiring a lawyer. He said he purchased the property in good faith for $249,000. He was just getting by with his new business even before the railroad agent visited his shop.

"He's given me a month to comply. He upset my (12-year-old) son so badly he started crying," he said. "I'm not going to pay unless a District Court judge orders me to."

Railroad Dollars

The state-owned N.C. Railroad Co. makes money from its track-rights agreement with Norfolk Southern and various building, roadway, utility and right-of-way lease agreements.

The line accommodates eight Amtrak passenger trains a day, carrying 300,000 passengers a year. It also handles 70 freight trains daily.

N.C. freight traffic has increased 15 percent in five years, said Railroad President Scott Saylor. The railroad claims a $338 million benefit to the N.C. economy, according to a research report from RTI International.

The state railroad cleared $7.16 million last year off $15.53 million in revenue and $8.37 million in expenses.

About $13.86 million of income was from Norfolk Southern and various lease agreements. About $418,000 of it is from 233 lease agreements with small business owners who use the railroad's 200-foot right of way, the company said.

Concerned about the right of way? Call the N.C. Railroad Co. at 919-954-7601.

317 Miles of Leases for N.C. Railroad Co.

The state owns the 317-mile N.C. Railroad Co. line and the 200-foot right of way. It runs from Charlotte to Morehead City. The state-owned company is trying to collect rent from businesses located in the right of way over the years due to surveying errors.


including a nice pic of Josh and the fam... :D

103-railroad_1.standalone.prod_affiliate.57.JPG


Frank Abernethy stands on the tracks just behind his business with his sons, Jake, 12,
and Josh, 23. "Nobody told me that when I bought the building," Abernethy said of the N.C. Railroad
Co.'s ownership of the land. (GAYLE SHOMER -- gshomer@charlotteobserver.com)
 
Well, that goes back on the Title insurance company his attorney hired when he bought the building. They should cover costs. I'd have a survey done. If the railroad wasn't running before, but will now be running and is willing to make stops at that location in exchange for the lease than the real estate MAY become more valuable as there would now be potential for bigger industry to occupie. That of course depends on land demands along the tract and the size of the site. In other words....it may be worth it for him to consider leasing/selling to a company that would be able to capitolize on the trackfront property and find another building.
 
Hmmm. Doesn't mention him going after the lawyer that did the title search on his land when he bought it and didn't find/disclose the ROW. That'll open a can'o'worms.

Edit, still typing when Aggressive posted...same thought.
 
I believe this would fall under whatever law NC uses for prescriptive easements, whether there is one or not though, I dont know.
 
I hope he bouight title insurance....

Many in York County know about this all too well. 10 Years ago, the Eastern Band of Catawbas laid claim to over 1000 acres currently holding about 400 houses.

Matters settled out of court by the state, but now title insurance is a requiremnt down here.
 
The name sounds familiar...but who is Frank?


that's Universal Automotive...where a LOT of the driveshafts on this site come from...

it's where Andy @ CRS had a majority of the ones he uses at the shop built...

and Josh is a member on here, and you may have wheeled with him (I know I have at DPG and UNF)...

Greg
 
^LOL. Its a durn shame the government uses so much of OUR money to take more of OUR money.
 
I'm sure there will be lots of lawsuits...and you can bet the state/RR will be on the winning side...the best bet any property owners have is to sue the seller of the land for not making a full disclosure. The government is NOT in the business of losing - whether it be money, property, lawsuits, etc...If in fact there are deeds going back hundreds of years, then it's just lax real estate transactions that have allowed people to develop that area...fwiw, this is going on in Greensboro, and all around the state as it mentioned. There have been several articles in local papers...
It's kind of like a person buying a stolen car, then spending thousands to restore it...even though you bought it in good faith, the seller keeps your money, since they've probably vanished without a trace, the police take back the car, plus whatever you've put into it...
 
ok great.. title insurance is fine as long as everything is documented AND accessible. Not some 100 year old, paper someone claims they found.. If the surveyors are using tax maps and other (state) public documents to determine the validity of a title then there should be no discrepancies.. So the fact that the NC railroad is essentially state owned company means 'they' are in fact not doing their part in updating their records..

I'd sue for previously paid property tax.
 
Like I said, prescriptive easement. It essentially says, if you have been using a right of way for some set period of time without owners permission, OR DENIAL, for a set number of years (I believe its generally 5) then its perfectly fine to continue using it..I dont believe the RR companies can force them to pay.
 
Like I said, prescriptive easement. It essentially says, if you have been using a right of way for some set period of time without owners permission, OR DENIAL, for a set number of years (I believe its generally 5) then its perfectly fine to continue using it..I dont believe the RR companies can force them to pay.
These are actually right-of-ways that were obtained legally many years ago and were poorly/inaccurately recorded/disclosed throughout the years. Unfortunately, those things do not change the fact that a right-of-way (like a public street) still exists.

Hopefully the property owners can reach some sort of compromise. The new push is for "inland ports" that will relieve some of the trucking congestion in port cities along the eastern seaboard. Cargo will simply be offloaded onto trains that will deliver further inland and offload for trucking at those sites.
 
As with so many other things in life... it's all about the presentation.
Personally I think where things are really getting f-ed up is the two guys running thsi show showing up unnannounced and demanding people to sign a lease right there. How freaking inconsiderate and rude. No wonder people get pissy about it. I don't care if you were gonna give the property away, you scare my son and I'll fight you on it out of principle.
Thiese knuckheads need to approach this like gentleman and consider what it must be liek for the people being affected. Regardless of who's "right" it is (the unfortunate truth is, they really do have a valid claim), if you want people to go along with you, you have to be polite to them. Especially when you're doin gsomething that's gonna hurt them.
They should start off by sending cetified (signature required, receipt confirmed etc) letters, requesting a return phone call. If (of course, "when") that dosn't happen, phone call. Leave a messege. Try twice. THEN show up in person. Don't bring the legal document, mention it's coming. Then follow again w/ the docs. Allow folks some time to adjust (AKA not 30 days), and explore their legal options... because if you really ARE "in the right", it won't matter anyway and they'll discover this on their own.
It's been 100 freakin years, what difference will a few months make!
I'm sure what they're thinking is, the only way it will get done is to bulldog-it and coerce into signing before they have tiem to raise hell. Fark that, be a man about it.
 
Not only ar the people entitled to go after the title company but the Real Estate person who sold them the property. There is the possibility of eminated domain. The next scary though is the RR has lots of money and attorneys. Thirdly cities were built around the railroad and often they have more rights than the cities.

Hope it all works out.
 
Not only ar the people entitled to go after the title company but the Real Estate person who sold them the property. There is the possibility of eminated domain. The next scary though is the RR has lots of money and attorneys. Thirdly cities were built around the railroad and often they have more rights than the cities.
Hope it all works out.

What do you mean 'go after' the title company? Title insurance is bought to protect you against spurious claims and defects in title such as this kind of case (the Catawba Indians claim has been mentioned as a good example all ready) So in essence you use the insurance which you bought and paid for to help you.
Eminant Domain may be a course of action for the railroad if they can prove its in the public interest to do so.

Perhaps you meant the doctrine of Adverse Possession.
Basically the 'owner' claiming title to real estate by adverse possession must have actual possession that is open, notorious, exclusive and adverse to the claims of other persons to the title ie the railroad, even if this poor owner thought they had good title. When the state is involved I believe the possession has to occur over period of 21 years for an actual claim to be effective.
And what did the Realtor do wrong? I don't have access to 100+ yr old maps which may or may not contain RR right of ways??:shaking:

Thats why we (yes I'm a realtor) seek out attorney's to give opinions on title (and why lenders require them to), who I might add only have to search public records going back 30 years before they give that opinion, and as we come full circle its the reason why title insurance is required by lenders and is a general good idea against claims like this.
 
Back
Top