- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
- Location
- Sharon, SC
I totally understand and support taxes, and really don't want to get in a my e-dick is bgger than yours, dem/rep debate.
But here is my real problem with this.
I have a 1968 Topps nolan ryan Rookie Card. (I think its 1968, it is the famous him and I think jerry koosman double card any card collectors can correct me if my year is wrong) That as luck would have it my Dad got from a pack of ball cards he bought the night hi and my mom went out on a date for the first time. Long story, he never bought baseball cards, just bought this pack on a whim (I suspect as a possible add on to a condom purchase, he he), they kept them as a first date souveneir supposedly. Years later when I was around 10 the marriage had long since desolved but my mom still had the pack of cards. I got into sports cards as a kid like many of us, and often had friend say that card is worth x or Y.
No the real answer is that card is worth #1 what someone is willing to pay for it and #2 what I am willing to accept for it. In my case the item is priceless because I would not sell it. Same with this baseball, how can someone place an arbitrary value on a sentimental item?
This is a dangerous precedent to allow someone to value something of yours you dont hold as a commodity. My grandpa has several oak tress on his property that are over 100 years old, to a tree hugger these are probably worth 1,000,000 dollars what if he received a tax statement in the mail for property valued at 1,000,000?
its the same legal precedent
But here is my real problem with this.
I have a 1968 Topps nolan ryan Rookie Card. (I think its 1968, it is the famous him and I think jerry koosman double card any card collectors can correct me if my year is wrong) That as luck would have it my Dad got from a pack of ball cards he bought the night hi and my mom went out on a date for the first time. Long story, he never bought baseball cards, just bought this pack on a whim (I suspect as a possible add on to a condom purchase, he he), they kept them as a first date souveneir supposedly. Years later when I was around 10 the marriage had long since desolved but my mom still had the pack of cards. I got into sports cards as a kid like many of us, and often had friend say that card is worth x or Y.
No the real answer is that card is worth #1 what someone is willing to pay for it and #2 what I am willing to accept for it. In my case the item is priceless because I would not sell it. Same with this baseball, how can someone place an arbitrary value on a sentimental item?
This is a dangerous precedent to allow someone to value something of yours you dont hold as a commodity. My grandpa has several oak tress on his property that are over 100 years old, to a tree hugger these are probably worth 1,000,000 dollars what if he received a tax statement in the mail for property valued at 1,000,000?
its the same legal precedent