Making a Murderer - anybody watch it on Netflix yet?

jcramsey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Location
Marion, NC
So my wife and I couldn't sleep at 3 am yesterday and started watching this documentary. Very interesting story....10 episodes later :eek: and its hard for me to believe a jury arrived at the verdict that they did. Anybody else that's seen it think they got it wrong? Or right?
 
image.jpeg
 
I have watched it. While I don't think he is innocent, I think the court/jury failed him. The documentary is obviously one sided also. If you want to get into a bigger time-suck, start researching the stuff left out and theories.

If you liked it, and haven't listened; give Serial a shot.
 
paradisePWoffrd said:
I have watched it. While I don't think he is innocent, I think the court/jury failed him. The documentary is obviously one sided also. If you want to get into a bigger time-suck, start researching the stuff left out and theories.

If you liked it, and haven't listened; give Serial a shot.
Click to expand...


Chris_M said:
Did he do it? Maybe but there is ton of reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...


Hurley said:
It's a tv show; regardless of the injustices done or not done, the viewer's only going to see the angle that the producers generate.
Click to expand...


I would agree that it is one sided for sure, and we obviously don't see every detail from the trial. There is a ton of reasonable doubt in my mind as well though.
 
ID did a special on it and they totally shattered all the evidence that said he didn't do it.....the Netflix show was definitely one sided
 
The documentary did not convince me that he was guilty, but it also seemed to show lots of holes. There was definitely some shady stuff going on, but that has nothing to do with whether or not Avery actually murdered the girl. If the jury only saw the documentary, he would apparently be ruled innocent. And if everything I saw on TV was true, Obama is the greatest president this nation has ever seen.
 
The 1 piece of the puzzle that gives me doubt and goes against everything the Prosecution claims; they found burned bone fragments at the quarry. If the prosecution is saying that he murdered her at his house and burned her in the barrel/fire pit, there should be bone fragments at another location.

I read an article that made a pretty convincing point to indicate that Bobby Dassey and Scott Tadych did it.

Apparently Steven's new lawyer is going to coat the trailer and garage with Luminol to try and prove his innocence.
 
I just don't think you could gang rape a women and cut her throat in your bed, without leaving some evidence behind, a single hair, sweat, one drop of blood even. Also, to shoot someone 16 times at point blank range, with no blood spatter remaining in a garage that cluttered. there is no way he's good enough to sanitize that crime scene to the point there is no evidence.
 
Finished watching the Brendan Dassey trial episode last night. I find it strange that the prosecutor would claim that he must have done all of the stuff he confessed to in the trailer, yet state in Steve Averys trial that everything happened in the garage when the defense argues that there is no evidence anything happened in the trailer. I know since it's a different case he can say anything he wants, but it's just one more thing that doesn't add up at all.
 
Last edited:
The documentary left out the fact SA requested only her to show up as the photographer and had a huge boner for her. I cant sit here and say he is guilty or not, but the court should have not allowed a bunch of the evidence to be admissible. And, what I find even more messed up is the fact the prosecutor went on TV and described word for word, every detail of how SA and BD killed this lady, basically painting a guilty picture before the trial even started. Regardless if the court ruled to have that stricken from the jurors discussions, that still sticks in your head. AND the dismissed juror who said it was 7 not guilty to 3 guilty and 2 undecided when he left and not but 1.5 days later, they come back guilty. Too many shady invariables to find guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
 
possession of a fire arm by a felon is a federal crime, 20 years right? in the end, it doesnt really matter whether he did it, hes essentially facing life, right?
 
Back
Top