Man Eats Cellmate's Lung!

MadAR15

New Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Location
Bessemer City
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...with_butchering_cellmate_thierry_baudry_.html


Nicolas Cocaign trial in France: Charged with butchering cellmate Thierry Baudry, eating his lung

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...g_cellmate_thierry_baudry_.html#ixzz0rWtMA1JH

All that was missing were some fava beans and a Chianti.

A real-life Hannibal Lecter allegedly butchered his cellmate in a French prison, intending to fry up the man's heart with onions on a makeshift grill and devouring it.

But the anatomically ignorant psychopath ate the man's lung by mistake.

Nicolas Cocaign, 39, appeared in a court room Monday to face murder charges in the grisly January 2007 murder of Thierry Baudry, London's Daily Telegraph reported.

What started as a fight between the two men in the cell ended up with Cocaign pummeling his 41-year-old victim with his fists, then suffocating him with a garbage bag and slashing his chest open with a pair of scissors.

"[I was] curious to see what he tasted like," Cocaign told investigators.

Cocaign then broke one of Baudry's ribs and removed his lung, mistaking it for the heart, eating part of it raw before frying up another morsel.

A third cellmate, David Lagrue, witnessed the attack and was so horrified that it is believed to have been the motivation for his November 2009 suicide in another prison, the Daily Mail reported.

Not surprisingly, Cocaign's attorney, Fabien Picchiottino, is pushing for an insanity defense.

"My client should not be in prison, he should be in a mental institution," Picchiottino told the court. "The prison authorities must share the blame for not spotting his fragile mental condition."

A verdict is expected on Thursday.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...g_cellmate_thierry_baudry_.html#ixzz0rWtQ8AOf
 
why beat him then suffocate him with a bag if he had scissors?
 
I say an eye for an eye. He killed someone, don't let him be a burden on society (even if it is on the French). They say it costs more to execute someone, well, I got a cartridge that says it isn't. Time to turn prison back in to prison and make punishments something that might actually deter criminal activity.
 
I say an eye for an eye. He killed someone, don't let him be a burden on society (even if it is on the French). They say it costs more to execute someone, well, I got a cartridge that says it isn't. Time to turn prison back in to prison and make punishments something that might actually deter criminal activity.

The problem with this... is the obvious insanity.
While I agree that there is a societal burden being bournehere - there is that damn morale question of what to do with people who simply may not have had a choice in the matter.

Eating a lung? Ew. I mean come on, there are a lot of body parts that would be reasonably hearty (um, sorry for the pun) and meaty. A lung has got to be one of the worst possible chunks of a man to bite into. Imagine the texture....
 
I say an eye for an eye.
Problemwith this is we both end up blind...
"I say to you, those ways are passed. When a brother slaps your face turn the other cheek and offer it to him as well"
 
The problem with this... is the obvious insanity.

At this point I see the insanity claim, now...but what about before hand? What prompted this behavior? Is it a show, was he always crazy, did prison cause him to go crazy? Fine don't kill him, but I say turn prisons back in to a deterent.

Problemwith this is we both end up blind...
"I say to you, those ways are passed. When a brother slaps your face turn the other cheek and offer it to him as well"


I can't match that eloquence. That being said, as the great philosophizer Ron White once said, if you kill somebody, you should get killed back. And I sure as hell wouldn't be walking around blind, that would be left to the Murdered and the Murderer. I might get a cramp in my trigger finger, but that would be the extent of my discomforts.
 
I might get a cramp in my trigger finger, but that would be the extent of my discomforts.

BUT..if eye for an eye, then you must be killed as well. You didnt say justifiable eye for justifiable eye, you said eye for an eye...so if you kill you get killed. But then the executioner must be killed

Look I am just trying to make ya think. Not even real sure where I stand on this...not all that log ago I was steadfast on your side...today not so sure.
 
Back
Top