I run front head plates because of how my engine is located in the chassis. No room for regular engine mounts.Do you run a mid motor plate?
I thought about rear head plates but don't see the value give how I don't race nor have 1000+ hp to contain.
I run front head plates because of how my engine is located in the chassis. No room for regular engine mounts.Do you run a mid motor plate?
Why do it ok when you can do it oker-er-er!!!Didn't like the small tab, it was late and I was be lazy. This is mo betterView attachment 449100
we mount all of our trans and tcases from the top now as well. No mid motor plates, no head mounts. We have gotten away with lots of tcases mounted from below at the tailshaft, but that is very well braced in our chassis, but all of the transmissions are mounted from above and now even the atlas tailshafts are as well. Its just simple and easy to eliminate any potential failures by doing that. Especially if you cant guarantee that the lower part of the chassis is braced perfectly.Looking closer I think the PO added a frame mounted cross member for the trans that was not part of the original design. The Atlas has a support from the top and mounts on the rear of the case. Looks like there is a provision for another top mount where the trans and atlas mate. I think the entire drivetrain was mounted from above and did not use a trans cross member. Another thing to ponder![]()
I remember Lee C car having head plates. Y'all decided to not keep installing them?we mount all of our trans and tcases from the top now as well. No mid motor plates, no head mounts
No there just isnāt a need with them already being mounted in 4 places. Especially when poly mounted ⦠maybe if everything was hard mounted Iād want to have more conversations about mid plates and head mounts. But itās just not necessary, and probably even detrimental in other chassis where you canāt guarantee they are truly rigid. Mine does not have head or mid plate and Iām not in the slightest bit concerned even with 800+hp. The 1500 hp no budget build is the same way.I remember Lee C car having head plates. Y'all decided to not keep installing them?
I agree with you they are probably not needed and overkill.
Him and I had a good discussion on the top mounting and its advantages before I gave him my extra 74weld adapter.
I like how both the trans and tcase are held together on his chassis.
The trick to hard mounting is 1) making sure the chassis is 100% rigid and 2) making sure your mounts are in plane, super solid, and you have enough of them.Solid mounts should never be used in an off-road application, hard impacts would transfer stress to the drivetrain. IMO head mounts should not be used in any application, way too much stress on the head bolts. Torque twist combined with thermal expansion and you're asking for head gasket problems.
In general, yea thatās correctYou really donāt want to be over constrained, chassis flex etc will happen and that stress has to go somewhere
There are cars that cannot take soft mounts.Solid mounts should never be used in an off-road application, hard impacts would transfer stress to the drivetrain.
My car is head mounted. As are all Bent Fab cars that he set the drivetrain in.IMO head mounts should not be used in any application, way too much stress on the head bolts. Torque twist combined with thermal expansion and you're asking for head gasket problems.
Y'all added power to this thing?????The 1500 hp no budget build is the same way.
Lots of U4 cars are built like this. Especially mid-engine builds. Granted, those are a much different can of worms than we are talking about here...There are cars that cannot take soft mounts.
I have knowledge of a few 1000+hp race cars that will absolutely wreck the rubber in the mounts in a matter of minutes.
Solid mounting was the only solution.
Head mounts were all the rage back in the late 2000s when offroad chassis design was still in that stage of "fuck it put a tube there I think?" Once people started figuring out the Triangle method of mounting things, head mounts stopped being as much of a thing. They really don't do anything unless you just don't have a way to conventionally mount your motor. I dont love them, but its mostly just personal preference...not because we have torn any shit up using them. BUT we have a very rigid chassis and still always use conventional mounts as well which basically just nullifies the head mounts, so im not sure it really matters. I wouldnt ever just hang one from the heads...I just couldnt bring myself to trust that.My car is head mounted. As are all Bent Fab cars that he set the drivetrain in.
I have beat the ever living crap out of it and somehow it survived everything with 0 issues. I know of plenty of other owners with no problems either.
Oh, I have had the heads out of the engine 2 times and have re-used the head bolts and the head gaskets... Iron block LS engines are incredibly tough.
It's unconventional, but it works.
Y'all added power to this thing?????
Thatās pretty sweet!My preferred method of removing mill scale is 15 min bath in muriatic acid, rinse water, and blow dry immediately. No sanding, no mess, and easy
Before:
View attachment 449239
After:
View attachment 449240
I see you're using 3 bolt flanges on the exhaust. Any particular reason you didn't use V-bands?
I'll be doing what you're doing next summer and starting to plan out my exhaust routing and components.
Granted, I've always done what you're doing. But I'm thing about V-bands for the new rig.
Use V band or ball clamps. You won't regret that.I see you're using 3 bolt flanges on the exhaust. Any particular reason you didn't use V-bands?
I'll be doing what you're doing next summer and starting to plan out my exhaust routing and components.
Granted, I've always done what you're doing. But I'm thing about V-bands for the new rig.
Nipple clamps have long been a favorite too. I'll take your suggestion!Use ...ball clamps. You won't regret that.
Nipple clamps have long been a favorite too. I'll take your suggestion!