WARRIORWELDING
Owner opperator Of WarriorWelding LLC.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2008
- Location
- Chillin, Hwy 64 Mocksville NC
Lets take welding as an example. Hands down either sex can do it. Hands down both genders learn very differently.
When I train or teach a fella he is usually more hands on grab and go. Head down work through it push to accomplish. Most striving to get something going and learn the finer arts and settings later. This sets a precedent of accomplishment. After a firm grasp on the physical is accomplished you can add in the mental and some more detail specific information. Most guys learn straight out of mimicking technique and what they see.
Women, polar opposite. Most women are more interested in the how, why, specifics rather than the overall picture. Explaining adjustments, angles, approaches, and techniques accomplish far more than simple demonstrations. Women usually lack in technique for a few weeks because they are processing everything coming and going. Then after a short spell the motor skills kick in and holy crap!! The females are out welding most dudes. However if I just try to skip the details and say just do it this way or that..........most females become frustrated and fall behind.
Different genders learn and cope differently. Welding is just a small window. A gender neutral window at that. The age specifics of both the populations in the questioned setting; combined with very different maturity levels, points directly at the intended need for social segregation. This segregation was to develop these strong gender specific qualities. We were created to complement each other. Strengths and weaknesses. We shouldn't look for gender equality because nature divided us with a penis vagina for a reason. Can men and women take on mutual goals and or responsibilities? Yes. But don't dilute our gender specific qualities to accomplish it. Boys and Girls need specific role models and pier groups to accomplish this. Specific enough that it bothers me that organizations fail to retain gender specific leadership for both.
We have Girl Scouts. We have Boy Scouts. We have Explorer/Adventure Scouts..... the combined minimum age specific program. Leave it be and rebuild its intended purpose. If not, I hope it goes away. I would prefer a complete smaller structure over inclusive broadened pen strokes. Better to be strong and unpopular then watered down garbage.
When I train or teach a fella he is usually more hands on grab and go. Head down work through it push to accomplish. Most striving to get something going and learn the finer arts and settings later. This sets a precedent of accomplishment. After a firm grasp on the physical is accomplished you can add in the mental and some more detail specific information. Most guys learn straight out of mimicking technique and what they see.
Women, polar opposite. Most women are more interested in the how, why, specifics rather than the overall picture. Explaining adjustments, angles, approaches, and techniques accomplish far more than simple demonstrations. Women usually lack in technique for a few weeks because they are processing everything coming and going. Then after a short spell the motor skills kick in and holy crap!! The females are out welding most dudes. However if I just try to skip the details and say just do it this way or that..........most females become frustrated and fall behind.
Different genders learn and cope differently. Welding is just a small window. A gender neutral window at that. The age specifics of both the populations in the questioned setting; combined with very different maturity levels, points directly at the intended need for social segregation. This segregation was to develop these strong gender specific qualities. We were created to complement each other. Strengths and weaknesses. We shouldn't look for gender equality because nature divided us with a penis vagina for a reason. Can men and women take on mutual goals and or responsibilities? Yes. But don't dilute our gender specific qualities to accomplish it. Boys and Girls need specific role models and pier groups to accomplish this. Specific enough that it bothers me that organizations fail to retain gender specific leadership for both.
We have Girl Scouts. We have Boy Scouts. We have Explorer/Adventure Scouts..... the combined minimum age specific program. Leave it be and rebuild its intended purpose. If not, I hope it goes away. I would prefer a complete smaller structure over inclusive broadened pen strokes. Better to be strong and unpopular then watered down garbage.
