- Joined
- Mar 10, 2005
- Location
- Hooterville (24171)
If you could see a picture of the frame it's pretty obvious. Rear bumper, bed weight, spare tire weight hanging off the rear of the frame, gets thinner just above the bump stop. A hard impact at that point combined with all that weight over hanging having momentum in the opposite direction is the cause. LOL at the caption under this picture.I'm having a tough time figuring out how this happened. Was it high centered? I'd think it would bend the other way if it were from jumping the truck.
Here's the thing, though....
The guy posted video of the incident.
And... they were moving pretty good. And hit a couple of BIG kickers... by their own estimate, 12-18" high.
Now... what do you think would happen if you were rolling down the interstate at 70mph and hit a 12" high speedbump? Think it would fawk some shit up? Imagine that.
Threads like that are what's wrong w/America. Duder wrecked his truck. He needs to suck it up and pay to get it fixed. Ford might have done better with the bump placement, but then something else would have broken... probably the housing.
We rode around w/a Raptor at KOH the year before last. They do pretty well in factory trim... for a factory built desert truck. But a lot of people apparently think they can drive them like they're prerunners worth 2x as much.
WORD.
After reading the text of this guy describing what happened, one could be swayed into thinking he may have a point. After watching the video, he come's off as a whiny little bitch.
He jumped his truck and landed on the face of the next hill instead of the back side of it. Had he cleared the hill the impact may not have even been hard enough to bend anything.
Regardless, if you take your truck offroad at 70+ mph over whoops and jumps and ANYTHING happens to it, expecting the dealer/manufacturer to pay for it is absurd.
So true. I'm amazed at the lack of quality design by some truck manufacturers. A friend of mine owns a newer Tundra
Doesn't surprise me, have you seen the Ford vid where they compare frame rigidity between fullsize 1/2 tons when they were introducing the new boxed frame? They ran them across alternating speed bumps so the truck had to quickly "articulate" across them side to side. The bed on the Tundra looked like it was going to fall off it was flopping around so bad. IIRC it may have even contacted the cab in the test.So true. I'm amazed at the lack of quality design by some truck manufacturers. A friend of mine owns a newer Tundra, I think it is an 08, and they put a pallet of rock in the bed and the frame bent so the top of the bed was hitting the cab.
Skimmed the raptor forum, seems the dealers refuse to fix it too even though its obvious they slacked off in the rear frame area to make room for the bumpstops.
Good for Ford... lol
A Ford Truck forum I'm on has several certified Ford techs, as well as a few dealers/salesmen perusing the site...and everyone of them say that the warranty pretty explicitly states that the Raptor can't be used as the desert runner that so many folks think they were built for...and if they are, the warranty work is refused and in a lot of cases warranties are voided.
I guess this is another reason to buy the Dodge Power Wagon. If all these people who purchased the raptor would have done some research they would have seen it was a gimick by Ford it was never ment to be an actual offroad truck.
I guess this is another reason to buy the Dodge Power Wagon.
Pretty sure one of those bent Furds could still outrun the Ram.
Pretty sure one of those bent Furds could still outrun the Ram.