It doesn't read that way to me at all. Screen caps say the customer says the vendor is broke, screen caps also say vendor continues to churn out other similar builds. If the vendor is too broke to repay or fund the project or an attorney, how is he funding the other projects that one should assume cost similarly. Or are they embellishing to give that added extra victim touch.
Furthermore, if what you're saying is the case, I'm failing to see why the vendor is the bad guy and why his supplier isn't. Earlier this year there was a surprise shortage in homosalate...customer pre-paid, I paid $100k for this one individual material, I was told 'end of the month/beginning of next' 4 times, I'm handcuffed, and I'm not disrupting my cash flow to that magnitude for something that's not my fault. I have one machine shop that takes about 3x longer than quoted every single time...I rarely use them because of it, but with engine volume I had to drop off a basic clean and bore, 6 months later I pick up an untouched block and heads, but for the last 6 months I've been told another week, another week another week...even if I told my customer it was another month, I still woulda been wrong. Both shitty scenarios, and I don't like them...but if the vendor's vendor is the source of the problem, let the mob harass them.
Edit...I reiterate that this assumes the axle builder isn’t just a complete crook, but I do see scenarios where this is potentially justifiable without seeing the other side of the story.