Sure, just wait to build it til I test it out.. that or I can fab a second one when I get it ironed out and just mail it to you. The patent outlines what's necessary, basically send a data block, activate prog volt then wait till the PCM reports programmed those bytes, turn off volt, repeat till finished. I forget what each control line is without looking but DTR/RTS is one side and DSR/CTS is the other side. (Goes back to days of terminals and computers, where one is DCE and one is DTE, which signifies if it is input or output on certain pins, but for my purposes, as long as there are a total of 2 output control lines(should have RTS/CTS & DSR/DTR), it will work, but if it doesn't I have USB microcontrollers I've been using for my interface and sim).. I've got the board nearly complete for the Sim but need to write up the code now (50% done). I'm about ready to do it in stages (ckp/cmp, verify its "running", add map/tps, verify, add CTS/IAT, instead of doing it all at one time and troubleshooting everything at once) at least I've got the interface working to simulate a drb so I can use it to verify the CTS, IAT, TPS, MAP, RPM. Plus that lets me verify code in the SBEC by seeing the code used to send it to drb a which gives me verification that I've got the memory correctly labeled, which in turn verifies my identification of the code routines.
So no, I'm not just recalibrating the PCM for different cam, displacement, etc, but reengineering it to alter the inputs and calculations to accommodate the 2bar map and boost.
@Mac5005
Retuning fuel and spark is very much capable at this point. I just want to verify it works properly before pushing it out the door. (Thus the Sim, which can handle full fuel at idle and lean fuel at high rpm. And still run. Without blowing up. Oh and over advanced timing that would put a rod out the block.) ( Which I will probably do something silly like that because it's easier to see than a minor change, for diagnostic purposes)