After 15 kids that cooch must feel like throwing a hot dog down a hallway.
....sideways.
After 15 kids that cooch must feel like throwing a hot dog down a hallway.
i hate this they want to regulate everything and stuff maybe they should regulate everything they need to, maybe if you dont want to even try to get a job you should be limited to the # of kids you can have if you have any support by the state

x2 and i think if you are on welfare you should be kept sterile, you prove you can support yourself and then you get the opportunity to have kids! think of how much money that would save us!!
oh i think they should drug test you to get your welfare check or food stamps. and not just for illegal drugs, i think if you are on welfare or disabled you should not be allowed to drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes. that would get a lot of people back to work!
x2 and i think if you are on welfare you should be kept sterile, you prove you can support yourself and then you get the opportunity to have kids! think of how much money that would save us!!
oh i think they should drug test you to get your welfare check or food stamps. and not just for illegal drugs, i think if you are on welfare or disabled you should not be allowed to drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes. that would get a lot of people back to work!


good thing you had a kickass life insurance policyOK so I'm going to throw out a question - b/c it's Friday evening and I have nothing else to do.
I have a good job and a good wife.
Lets say we decide to have 12 kids.
My wife dosn't work b/c, well, taking care of 12 kids takes every minute she has.
We can afford this b/c I make enough money to feed them. We don't ask anything from anyybody.
Anybody have a problem w/ that?
No?
Ok now lets say I get hit by a bus. Or fall off the roof of the house. Dead. Oops.
Now my wife has 12 kids, no job, and no income.
Would yoou help her out? Would you be pissed?
Does "If you can't feedt hem, don't breed them" apply?
It'd be pretty much guaranteed they'd be on welfare, eh?
[/stir pot]
![]()

OK so I'm going to throw out a question - b/c it's Friday evening and I have nothing else to do.
I have a good job and a good wife.
Lets say we decide to have 12 kids.
My wife dosn't work b/c, well, taking care of 12 kids takes every minute she has.
We can afford this b/c I make enough money to feed them. We don't ask anything from anyybody.
Anybody have a problem w/ that?
No?
Ok now lets say I get hit by a bus. Or fall off the roof of the house. Dead. Oops.
Now my wife has 12 kids, no job, and no income.
Would yoou help her out? Would you be pissed?
Does "If you can't feedt hem, don't breed them" apply?
It'd be pretty much guaranteed they'd be on welfare, eh?
[/stir pot]
![]()
Ah, but what if I didn't?good thing you had a kickass life insurance policy![]()
Dude, its a vagina, not a clown car.
----
Though on serious note, 2 completely different situations. One was able to support a family, the other was never able.
Ah, but what if I didn't?
Oh really? Do we really know that she was unprovided for before Daddy went to jail?
I mean dude went in for dealing Coke. Decent chance he was high-rollin and could indeed cover all those kids.
So as far as Mrs Clown Car Vagina is concerned, bills are paid, she can keep poppin out the babies (clowns). If it hadn't been for the State putting him in jail, they'd be OK..?
So now that I think of it, maybe the real problem here is the "war on drugs" for removing their income. The end result is we're now paying the bills for Daddy's 3 hots + cot AND welfare for all the kids.... hmmmm...
Then that would be an example of irresponsibility. A different form of said, but with a very similar (potential) outcome.
Or the baby-daddy could have gotten a job or some other source of currently legal income, wherein the state would not have put him in jail.
Again choice and responsibility.
Responsibility.....the lack of it is the repetitive theme in both your thoughts.
She's a leech on the skin of society, plain and simple.
Ah, but what if I didn't?
you're racist...sexist..anti-child......something...I mean there's no way this chick is completely responsible for her actions, somehow it's got to be someone elses fault, if not at least someone elses problem to deal with.
Well if you didn't have life insurance then you would be just as irresponsible as Adams.OK so I'm going to throw out a question - b/c it's Friday evening and I have nothing else to do.
I have a good job and a good wife.
Lets say we decide to have 12 kids.
My wife dosn't work b/c, well, taking care of 12 kids takes every minute she has.
We can afford this b/c I make enough money to feed them. We don't ask anything from anyybody.
Anybody have a problem w/ that?
No?
Ok now lets say I get hit by a bus. Or fall off the roof of the house. Dead. Oops.
Now my wife has 12 kids, no job, and no income.
Would yoou help her out? Would you be pissed?
Does "If you can't feedt hem, don't breed them" apply?
It'd be pretty much guaranteed they'd be on welfare, eh?
[/stir pot]
![]()
I take responsibility for all of my decisions and I expect everyone else to do the same.



I take responsibility for all of my decisions and I expect everyone else to do the same.
Well if you didn't have life insurance then you would be just as irresponsible as Adams.
I guess I am a hard ass or just cold hearted when it comes to stuff but I will try to explain my opinion. We all make decisions and we all have to live with the decisions we make for the rest of our lives. Nobody should ever have to take responsibility for a decision you have made whether it be the government, Church, your neighbor, your mom and dad, people waiting for a light to change or any other person you may have the palm of your hand facing. Granted, if you are good person, I'm sure you have friends and family bending over backwards to help as I would do for people that I love. If someone in that situation has nobody step up to help them out, then they must not be a good enough person to deserve help. If you and your wife decided to have 12 children, her quit work, you be the sole provider and have no life insurance then you have indirectly made a decision for your wife to have zero means to support herself and your children if something happened to you. That is not my fault or anyone elses and does not grant and hand out from anybody. If no family or friends offer help, then you folks have obviously either pissed way too many people or are not good people and do not deserve to be helped. As for the children in both cases; lessons, no matter how hard and brutal, need to be taught. If the mother and children recieve no help from the government, it would be more likely to break the cycle or in your example not begin a cycle than if they recieved a free rent home, a vehicle, utilities paid, etc by the government.
I take responsibility for all of my decisions and I expect everyone else to do the same.
I'm totally with you, I'm not happy about these situations either. In fact we have something similar occuring in my wife's family right now (down to Dad being in Jail).
All I'm saying is, we should ask who it is that really failed the responsibility test - I don't think it was just (or mainly) Momma Hotdog Hallway. IMO Daddy is probably the bigger f-up here.
I love how people expect something for nothing, I sold 1995 jeep cherokee few months back for 2000, it rann good a/c works, high mileage 200K, actually a pretty nice jeep, girl come back today to say the steering wheel shimmies when she hits the brakes @ 55mph. I told her she probably needs to have the front rotors turned, apparently this is my fault. Even though she bought the car 2 months ago as is for some reason she is not responsible for doing the regular maitenance and she wants her money back. She has children and I am taking advantage of her. I love it, the age of personal repsonsibility is over.....
