RufusTheRam said:15 sec. sports car? isn't that one of those oxymoron things?
Kinda
RufusTheRam said:15 sec. sports car? isn't that one of those oxymoron things?
BRUISER said:kids need beaters not race cars when they are in high school..
I'll have to agree there. My parents still drive their '82 300CD with around 300k on it. Once I got my license, I drove a '72 220D with a 4 spd manual. Great car but it had around 65 hp so you were real limited on the trouble you could get in. Awesome on dates though with the chrome all shined up.BIGWOODY said:(shameless plug) See me for all your 80's model Mercedes Benz diesel needs...I sell the hell out of them to customers to put their kids in. Barnone they are the perfect first car...hard to jackass in and built like a tank...best Benz that was ever put on the road the 123 chassis Diesel 77-85..
NC_Mog said:I'll have to agree there. My parents still drive their '82 300CD with around 300k on it. Once I got my license, I drove a '72 220D with a 4 spd manual. Great car but it had around 65 hp so you were real limited on the trouble you could get in. Awesome on dates though with the chrome all shined up.
Except for when they're running at 10- ... for ten miles. Been there and done that several times.100 mph left lane is too slow especially around D.C area they run in all lanes at 100+
I usually do the same, and am still amazed that people will try to go 85 mph just so they can get in front of me while I'm going 70. How fast DO they need to go?BRUISER said:I'll say it again I ride in middle lane going speed limit or maybe 5 over... I do not ride in right lane due to idiots that have no concept of how to merge and I do not block left lane but if you are speeding and I am blocking your path then you can stick it.. because you are breaking the law not me...
Then they should have a red or blue flasher on the dash or roof. It then becomes ILLEGAL for anyone else not to move over.Rich said:I slightly disagree. "Keep right except to pass" is the law. There's no reason to poke along in a lane, ANY lane, if there's a free lane to the right.
The police and state troopers enforce the law, not the citizens.
Is it so hard to move over when someone comes up behind ya, whether they are going 5mph faster than you are or 50?
Having had the pleasure of living and driving in Germany for a few years, it's second nature for them, regardless is you're in a speed zone or not.. if someone is coming up behind you moving faster than you are, and it's not unsafe, slide over one lane, and let them by.
Yeah, I spent six years in Germany too... but what I drove wouldn't do over 32mph. No idea why Germans thought it was a good idea to tailgate tanks OR zoom through a turn right in front of one. But they did.
Also, the Autobahns don't HAVE any speed limit except whatever's under your hood.
Just a closing thought... That guy who's coming up behind you going a little over, may be EMS/Fire/etc. who's not yet in their district, but knows their help is needed...
And then there was the time... I used to live in New Jersey, and commute to work ONE WAY was over 40 miles. I always had to go back roads to Rte 206/130 then about 35 miles on that until I had to take a left for another 8 miles or so of more back roads.bigassedredjeep said:i'm with rattlecan on this, i commute about 50 miles one way everyday and pass the same "old ass-mofo" reading the paper, wheel in one hand and coffee in the other, swerving accross his lane every GD day. and he's cussing me because i'm trying to get around him... if i could just get the minivans and grand parents out of the way, i might actually make it to work on time for once.
edit:...and most move over when they see the dually coming up, but the thing that is the most aggravating is when people block you in and you haven't done anything wrong, its like they just don't want to be passed? or they don't know that there are "two" lanes there for a reason?? i could see if i had been tailgating them, and then i try and go around on the right and they are just f*cking with me, but no
PoPo said:Technically, that is called a non-contact participant here in NC. "IF" they directly cause the accident, but are not hit, then they are still involved. However, if they stop short which causes a chain reaction with the next five cars but they are not touched, then it becomes the following distance of the other cars that is "responsible" for the wreck.
bigassedredjeep said:a dumbass ran us into the median and hit a drainage mound which sent the whole shi-bang skyward for about three feet.
since then, this has been my philosophy when pulling the jeep..
if i think it'll fit it will.
brandon
Ratman said:I get some ricer who decides to cut me off and I get clobbered from behind by the poor guy in the 2 ton truck.
PoPo said:The guy in the 2 ton should have been following further back. Now, in your story, if the guy cutting you off causes you to lose lane control and you cross the center line, crashing with oncoming traffic....that is a bonafide non contact vehicle and would be treated as a hit and run. One caveat, however, all involved parties must agree that there was "this other car". You can't just say the ghost car made me do it and you are released from fault.
Ratman said:You ever tried to leave 8~10 car lenghts between you and the car in front of you in 5pm traffic on 540? You'll spend your entire ride braking.
PoPo said:Lots of following distance saves both ends of your car.