OK, so you do realize that you are now arguing that God supported a war that involved enslaving another human being, right? Even if you don't believe that was the cause, you have to admit that was at least a factor of it. SMH.
There was slavery on both sides of the Mason-Dixon, but you were not taught that and if you do know it, you ignore it as an incovenient fact that doesn't support the narrative.
God supported many wars, Jews held slaves just like every other organized culture since men have walked the Earth. Paul exorted us to "treat our slaves well and not abuse them"
The war was not about slavery, it was about a people's right to not be oppressed by it's government. The South's seccession and the North's failure to ceed to their right to do so was NO different than when we stood against the tyranny of king George.
Slavery was already on it's way out in the South due to strong Christian influence. The Northern cotton buyers actually supported slavery to keep their own businesses flush with cash.
It was Northern slave ships and African sellers who continued the slave trade. Southern plantation owners bought them and used them to supply cotton to a North that was hungry for it.
Slavery was an American system, not a Southern one. Blacks were viewed as less intellegent and advanced by 90% of Americans and were in fact treated as property all over the nation.
Robert E. Lee letter dated December 27, 1856:
I was much pleased the with President's message. His views of the systematic and progressive efforts of certain people at the North to interfere with and change the domestic institutions of the South are truthfully and faithfully expressed. The consequences of their plans and purposes are also clearly set forth. These people must be aware that their object is both unlawful and foreign to them and to their duty, and that this institution, for which they are irresponsible and non-accountable, can only be changed by them through the agency of a civil and servile war. There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil. It is idle to expatiate on its disadvantages. I think it is a greater evil to the white than to the colored race. While my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more deeply engaged for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, physically, and socially. The painful discipline they are undergoing is necessary for their further instruction as a race, and will prepare them, I hope, for better things. How long their servitude may be necessary is known and ordered by a merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild and melting influences of Christianity than from the storm and tempest of fiery controversy. This influence, though slow, is sure. The doctrines and miracles of our Saviour have required nearly two thousand years to convert but a small portion of the human race, and even among Christian nations what gross errors still exist! While we see the course of the final abolition of human slavery is still onward, and give it the aid of our prayers, let us leave the progress as well as the results in the hands of Him who, chooses to work by slow influences, and with whom a thousand years are but as a single day. Although the abolitionist must know this, must know that he has neither the right not the power of operating, except by moral means; that to benefit the slave he must not excite angry feelings in the master; that, although he may not approve the mode by which Providence accomplishes its purpose, the results will be the same; and that the reason he gives for interference in matters he has no concern with, holds good for every kind of interference with our neighbor, -still, I fear he will persevere in his evil course. . . . Is it not strange that the descendants of those Pilgrim Fathers who crossed the Atlantic to preserve their own freedom have always proved the most intolerant of the spiritual liberty of others?
Abraham Lincoln
(1809-1865) 16th US President
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.”
Lincoln didn't care about slaves, he cared about power and his political career. He has been painted as a great man but he was nothing but a tyrant.