justjeepin86
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2005
- Location
- Winston-Salem, NC
even after I "fixed" em.I'm sure the brakes were crap.
Not at all. They had balls, usually decent gears, and the 6 wasn't very heavy.Sarcasm? I know nothing of the 225.
Had one in HS with a small cam, long tubes and a 390cfm 2barrel. It was a straight ripper on some 33’s. That was an early jeepster.Not at all. They had balls, usually decent gears, and the 6 wasn't very heavy.
I went to school w a guy who had one in a datsun pick up.Had one in HS with a small cam, long tubes and a 390cfm 2barrel. It was a straight ripper on some 33’s. That was an early jeepster.
A few years later I had a ‘85 Toyota with the 231 (3.8 ltr) V6 700r4 and that thing was a champ too. That motor came out of an older regal when they were still RWD.I went to school w a guy who had one in a datsun pick up.
they've been put in everything over the years.A few years later I had a ‘85 Toyota with the 231 (3.8 ltr) V6 700r4 and that thing was a champ too. That motor came out of an older regal when they were still RWD.
Ever since I was a kid I have always loved the 6's. IDK why but it is my preferred Jeep. Seems like a deal to me,
www.facebook.com
View attachment 373792
View attachment 373793
Yep sold already.Got o mighty I had to check this thread when it was too late. 6's are the raddest.
Seems a hell of a lot more useful than most of the ratrods that are modeled after it

Occurred right in that very spot
Yes.