RatLabGuy
You look like a monkey and smell like one too
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
- Location
- Churchville, MD
I don't think anybody disagrees with the principles laid out here.I hear ya, and I agree with a lot of the principles of what you're saying, but it's definitely not being communicated well in my opinion.
Politics and policies are a big part of it, but the American addiction to buying the cheapest shit is the driving force behind it. Harbor Freight used to make the cheapest crap tools at the cheapest prices, and Craftsman used to make good quality tools at a fair price with a lifetime warranty. Craftsman died while Harbor Freight flourished. Honestly, I place a big part of the blame on the boomers because they grew up with good stuff, took it for granted, cheaped out on everything for their own benefit, and didn't give a crap what was left in the wake.
The biggest problem with outsourcing that is impossible to accurately quantify is the long term value of the knowledge, equipment, and skills that are retained by keeping production stateside. Understanding how things are made and why they are made a certain way and how they are designed and what it takes to source and supply the raw material and go from nothing all the way to a finished product is often as much an art as it is a science. 99 times out of 100, a well sorted process will produce better results than a "better" process that is not yet optimized. Just look at what GM has done with the pushrod V8. Science can prove that dual overhead cams and desmodronic valves and pneumatic-this-and-thats are better, but a stock 400hp LS will still deliver a beatdown, run reliably for a quarter million miles, and is simple to work on and manufacture and assemble. And a little forced induction easily puts them in the nearly 700hp range, with a warranty, from the factory. Because it is well understood and well sorted out. The reason it works for the LS is because they have been developing that platform since the mid 90's.
The question remains, how do we address this problem? Some ideal has to give.Point being that when you separate engineering/production/assembly, there is a knowledge gap, and when you move these things to different countries in different time zones, there is a communication and understanding gap, and "progress" stalls and sometimes even regresses. Add in the drive of companies to make things cheaper (primary driver of outsourcing), and focus on investor returns (short term profits, often at the cost of long term value), and you end up in the situation we are in, where US companies post record profits for overpriced, low quality products, made in 3rd world countries (or 3rd world conditions), and often with little regard to true long term environmental impact of such disposable products and a non-level playing field when it comes to regulations and working conditions.
Either it is a willingness to deal with things just being produced elsewhere, OR a willingness to have a substantial change in how our free market operates, OR a willingness to have a lot more government involvement in the business cycle in order to steer the correction. There is no alternative to one of those. Tell me which ideal you're willing to violate and we can work out a solution.