Malaysia MH370

Cory said:
it list facts of 9/11 unarguable facts.
Click to expand...

Cory said:
Prove them wrong with facts then Ron.
Click to expand...

Cory said:
It's not just 9/11. Stay in they dark I'm not arguing , I'm just saying rant all you want , I'll believe science.
Click to expand...


So your argument went:
My beliefs are unarguable. Well even if they are arguable they are true. Well i'm not arguing and there is more...

Got it
 
Cory said:
I'm just saying rant all you want , I'll believe science.
Click to expand...

Me too. Empiricism.
In fact its my profession.
Thats why I don't buy 90% of the shit on that website.
 
Last edited:
Cory said:
That address none of the facts.
Click to expand...
chewbacca defense.jpg

@Ron I could not resist... that was brilliant.
 
Cory said:
That address none of the facts.
Click to expand...

Seriously? Did you actually read the article?
I think what you mean is the "truth". I'd hate for you confuse your truth, and the actual facts.
 
Cory said:
http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_17.htm this is a website of facts , not telling you what to think, it list facts of 9/11 unarguable facts.
Click to expand...

Shawn said:
Your website says that a plane didn't crash into the Pentagon. I have a close friend who witnessed a passenger jet crash into the Pentagon on 9/11/01
Click to expand...

Cory said:
No debris
Waaaay to small a hole for a 757 ....
Click to expand...

Shawn said:
Here's a picture of airplane debris and a picture of the 75ft wide hole that the body of the jet punched through the building. Here's a 15ft wide hole that the landing gear made as it punched through the building.
Click to expand...

Cory said:
That address none of the facts.
Click to expand...

.....

Really???
 
A landing gear , punched a 15 foot hole 310 feet from initial impact. Through 6 newly reinforced walls and a number of reinforced columns. K.

Yes really

How about read what the site I posted shows then counter.

Personal bash me all you want.
I am done egging on yalls anger towards this.





And as for " I have a friend that says he was there".

REALLY? Lol
 
Last edited:
Cory said:
Yes I did read the article did you read the one I posted?
Click to expand...

yes I did. ell sort of, I'll be honest I actually have a lot of work to do and don't have time to read every page of that garbage. But it dosn't take long to figure out where its going, or where it came from.
And as a result - your argument has even less credibility with me now.
Strong work.

As a scientist a big part of my job is knowing how to tell if a source is credible, as this is essentially what dictate "facts" from "somebody's story".
Anybody can type out words that say anything, and put them on a website and talk like is is an undeniable fact. But that doesn't actually make it correct.

Another part of science (since you like to point that out) is understanding that you cannot draw causal relationships between things when evidence is missing. The actual answer is "we don't know". Not "It must be this other thing because no other explanation holds". a lot of times the answer is simply, "we don't know". And within that unknown... is where 99% of conspiracy BS comes from.
 
Well if you watch the zapruder film you can cleary see...
 
Cory said:
And as for " I have a friend that says he was there".

REALLY? Lol
Click to expand...

No, he was actually there. Granted this was almost 13 years ago, but my recollection was that he was there for a project meeting that got cut short. At that time, they were renovating the building, which included increasing the blast resistance of the structure to protect building occupants from truck bombs and the like. The portion where the plane hit had recently been completed. The hardening contributed to the compartmentalization of damage, which created a lot of the oddities that the truthers latch onto.

I was on the north side of town when it happened. You could see the smoke plume from twenty miles off.
 
mommucked said:
I've wondered if the plane just plunged straight down into the sea after (pick a flight stopping event) . I've wondered if it could dive from 30k feet w/o breaking up? and if it was in one piece and nearly vertical when it hit the water would there be much debris at all left on the surface of the ocean?
Click to expand...
Lawn dart theory!
 
Whoops, gotta change my prognostication, I guess.

I'm leaning towards hijack or commandeering now. Reported by "US Authorities", it seems that two systems, a data uplink and the transponder were turned off or disabled 14 minutes apart. Also just happened to be at a critical time (peak confusion) as air traffic control was being transfered to a new region.

So...was the intent to crash into the ocean, or to make a landing in India, or hope to make Africa? Did they make it? No EPIRB makes you wonder...
 
I've been buggin a good friend who works for a the "airways" about this... and he keeps using cryptics terms... More or less he is saying the plane is landed... safely... and the passengers may or may not be hostages... but that it could be anywhere within several hundred miles of point X.

My money says the governments know, but aint saying as has been discussed...
 
Back
Top