ckruzer
Infidel
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2015
- Location
- asheville nc
who is john galt?
who is john galt?
It's not so much "less people is bad" as it is "disproportionately high ratio of old people is bad"Still fail to see how less people in any country is a bad thing or doomed.
Yeah! Kill all the old people!Gotta happen sometime!
And why is it bad? Can't the government just print money to take care of them? The USA proved that you can.
Or cut other entitlements. Or make everyone pay their share....no more free loaders. No more deductions for having children. Police, fire, ems take care of 8 year olds ...they should pay (through their parents/guardian)
This is the issue with constantly increasing freebies.... eventually the money runs out!
Might as well rip the band aid off now.
Yeah! Kill all the old people!
I mean, there's no need for age discrimination. If you'd push a 25 year old out of the way, why not Grandpa too? He has even more reason to know better.In fairness…I got stuck behind one today doing 27mph in a 55 zone…maybe not kill old people, but at least put them in the ditch when they’re in your way.
Because the entire world economy is one big Ponzi scheme. Without new "investors" to pay off the older investors, the entire system will come crashing down.
I wish Adam posted more. That is all.Because the entire world economy is one big Ponzi scheme. Without new "investors" to pay off the older investors, the entire system will come crashing down.
oh man....swing and a missYeah! Kill all the old people!
Not here to provide you with an education.And why is it bad?
When ya moving?the entire sentence was:
"And why is it bad? Can't the government just print money to take care of them? The USA proved that you can."
/s
BUT, less people in the US is an overall good thing.
See also: Whoopi Goldbergs entitled ass during the trump campaign. Lots of huff and puff with no follow through.When ya moving?
The rest of that sentence just shows that you don't understand the problem isn't about money. its about labor.the entire sentence was:
"And why is it bad? Can't the government just print money to take care of them? The USA proved that you can."
/s
BUT, less people in the US is an overall good thing.
Eh, but how many jobs are doing things useless to our livelihood. Those people could transfer to the jobs that we need filled.The rest of that sentence just shows that you don't understand the problem isn't about money. its about labor.
But they won’t because the jobs that NEED done are “below” them after living on the govco titty for so many years.Eh, but how many jobs are doing things useless to our livelihood. Those people could transfer to the jobs that we need filled.
It isn't a matter of losing jobs, it's not having people to do them. Do you really want even more increased competition for decent workers? Then where is the incentive to be good?Eh, but how many jobs are doing things useless to our livelihood. Those people could transfer to the jobs that we need filled.
Where does it stop though? When we have used up all our natural resources and have polluted the planet past the point of no return?It isn't a matter of losing jobs, it's not having people to do them. Do you really want even more increased competition for decent workers? Then where is the incentive to be good?
Like I said before there's something in between more people and less people.Where does it stop though? When we have used up all our natural resources and have polluted the planet past the point of no return?
The rest of that sentence just shows that you don't understand the problem isn't about money. its about labor.